Drawing for SABYASACHI CALCUTTA

USPTO serial 86944096

SABYASACHI CALCUTTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SABYASACHI CALCUTTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Usha Menon

USHA MENON D'AMBROSIO & MENON, PLLC12808 WEST AIRPORT BLVD.SUITE 329SUGAR LAND, TX 77478

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather goods, namely, leather bags, clutches, and shoulder beltsACTIVE—
020Furniture; Leather goods, namely, seat cushionsACTIVE—
021Household items, namely, glassware, namely, plates, bowls, and drinking and cocktail glassesACTIVE—
024Textile accessories, namely, textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing; textile fabrics for the manufacturing of clothing, namely, South Asian-style saris, kurtas, pajamas, blouses, shirts, pants, tops, skirts, wraps, ghagras, cholis, odhanis, Patiala, kurtis, lehenga, bottoms, knitted bottoms, wedding dresses, ceremonial dresses, salwar kameez, churidars, dupattas, scarves, head wraps, turbans and veilsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 19, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 5, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 6, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2017GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jan 3, 2017GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jan 3, 2017CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 3, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance