USPTO serial 86944527
SHINE COSMETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAZZELLA, BRANDY BARRETT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHINE COSMETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
American Fork, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley J. Weber
Bradley J. Weber EVANSON WEBER, PLLC62 NORTH GRANT AVENUE, SUITE 100AMERICAN FORK, UT 84003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic balls; Cosmetic bath salts; Cosmetic cotton wool; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic hand creams; Cosmetic masks; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic nourishing creams; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic oils for the epidermis; Cosmetic pads; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic preparations against sunburn; Cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; Cosmetic preparations for nail drying; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skincare; Cosmetic rouges; Cosmetic skin fresheners; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun milk lotions; Cosmetic sun oils; Cosmetic white face powder; Cosmetics; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics and make-up; Cosmetics in general, including perfumes; Cosmetics in the form of milks, lotions and emulsions; Cosmetics sold as an integral component of non-medicated skincare preparations; Cosmetics, namely, lip primer; Cosmetics, namely, lip repairers; Adhesives for cosmetic use; After-sun gels; Almond milk for cosmetic purposes; Aloe vera gel for cosmetic purposes; Amla oil for cosmetic purposes; Argan oil for cosmetic purposes; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Bath powder; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Castor oil for cosmetic purposes; Chalk for cosmetic use; Chemicals sold as components of cosmetics; Cleansing creams; Cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; Coconut oil for cosmetic purposes; Colognes, perfumes and cosmetics; Concealers; Eye compresses for cosmetic purposes; Eyebrow cosmetics; Face creams for cosmetic use; Flower essences for cosmetic purposes; Foams containing cosmetics and sunscreens; Gauze for cosmetic purposes; Gels for cosmetic purposes; Greases for cosmetic purposes; Hydrogen peroxide for cosmetic purposes; Impregnated cleaning pads impregnated with cosmetics; Lip stains; Make-up kits comprised of facial and eye powders, creams, and makeup; Nail paint; Nail primer; Nail varnish for cosmetic purposes; Oils for cosmetic purposes; Paraffin wax for cosmetic purposes; Pencils for cosmetic purposes; Petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; Pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes; Pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; Private label cosmetics; Rose oil for cosmetic purposes; Skin fresheners | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |