Drawing for IWAVEPHOROPTER

USPTO serial 86946557

IWAVEPHOROPTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IWAVEPHOROPTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory T. Bradford

KYLE M PENDERGRASS THE MUELLER LAW OFFICE PC12707 HIGH BLUFF DR STE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Eye testing machines and apparatusABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 31, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 31, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 31, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 23, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 12, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 27, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance