Drawing for V5PSU

USPTO serial 86947091

V5PSU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V5PSU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen S. Frank

Karen S. Frank COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLPONE MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 3000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Portable Security Platform comprising video surveillance cameras, acoustic microphones, chemical detection sensors not for medical sensors, for measuring chemical levels in ambient air; Global Positioning Systems, temperature sensors; devices for measuring humidity levels in gases and sold substances; two way radios; onboard computers; solid state storage in the nature of a nonvolatile storage medium that employs integrated circuits, batteries, wireless transmission, cellular transmission, radio frequency, satellite transmission, wireless transmission, Ethernet communications transmission, and provides live streaming video, real time analytics, real time alerts, hosting proprietary software and 3rd party software and applications; computerized power management system comprised of a computer and operating software thereof and battery charger that controls the charging of batteries and distribution of the batteries' powerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 19, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 4, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 3, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 22, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 20, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 19, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 12, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 26, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 16, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 18, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 7, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 1, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 19, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance