USPTO serial 86947213
MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory L. Maag
Gregory L. Maag Conley Rose, P.C.P.O. Box 3267Houston, TX 77253-3267UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software platform for collecting and distributing data within computer networks, including the internet, and enabling data communication among application programs, consumer devices and industrial devices in the field of oil and gas exploration and production; Computer software for use in asset optimization, industrial automation, machine diagnostics, predictive analytics and optimization of industrial, energy, manufacturing and infrastructure processes; Downloadable cloud computer software for information management, data collection and data analysis in the fields of asset optimization, industrial automation, machine diagnostics, and optimization of industrial, energy, manufacturing and infrastructure processes; Downloadable software for information management, data collection and data analysis in the fields of asset optimization, industrial automation, machine diagnostics, and optimization of industrial, energy, manufacturing and infrastructure processes; Downloadable software application for information management, data collection and data analysis in the fields of asset optimization, industrial automation, machine diagnostics and optimization of industrial, energy, manufacturing and infrastructure processes; Non-downloadable web-based software application for information management, data access and data analysis in the fields of asset optimization, industrial automation, machine diagnostics, predictive analytics and optimization of industrial, energy, manufacturing and infrastructure processes; none of the aforementioned goods being related to building products, building materials, entryways, doors or entryways and door-related systems and components and custom manufactured building products, building materials, entryways, doors or door-related systems and components | ACTIVE | May 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |