USPTO serial 86949738
CYBERNOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERNOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles G. Zug
CHARLES G ZUG NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP1320 MAIN STREET17TH FLOORCOLUMBIA, SC 29201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Integration of managed security services and cyber-security software and software-as-a-service (SaaS) in enterprise-level computer systems, networks, and IT systems; Providing computer systems information to others so that users can assess computer security incident response options; Monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning after remediation of computer security incidents and breaches; Providing an on-line portal featuring non-downloadable software for reporting information and data in the field of remediation of security threats and security breaches in computer systems and networks, in information technology applications, and in computer software and hardware | ABANDONED | — |
| 045 | Computer security services, namely, information technology system security remediation services in the nature of providing automated assistance to isolate, remediate, and monitor remediation of security threats and security breaches in computer systems and networks, in information technology applications, and in computer software and hardware; Computer services, namely, monitoring and reporting on the security status of computer systems and networks of others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |