Drawing for AKTIPAK

USPTO serial 86950376

AKTIPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AKTIPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert S. Silver

ROBERT S. SILVER CAESAR RIVISE, PC1635 Market Street7 Penn Center - 12th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-2212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Facial cleaning preparation, namely, salicylic acne cleanser not for medical purposes; non-medicated acne treatment preparationsACTIVEAug 4, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 26, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 19, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 19, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 14, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 28, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 16, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 12, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 29, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 29, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2016TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Mar 31, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance