USPTO serial 86951397
SKILLCRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKILLCRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
15000 Praha 5-Smichov, CZ
15000 Praha 5-Smichov, CZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK FABER LLP7TH FL 1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded and downloadable computer programs, software and software applications which are web based and are accessible electronically on the worldwide web as a software application by a computer, mobile device, smartphone or tablet computer, namely, educational software in the field of sales techniques, customer service, revenue building and communication which allows corporate and business personnel to connect and share feedback in regard to the subjects and their experiences | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing online non-downloadable videos and online classes in the field of sales techniques, customer service, revenue building and communication which allows corporate and business personnel to connect and share feedback in regard to the subjects and their experiences | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software in the field of sales techniques, customer service, revenue building and communication which allows corporate and business personnel to connect and share feedback in regard to the subjects and their experiences | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |