Drawing for DETER DISTRACT DELAY

USPTO serial 86952088

DETER DISTRACT DELAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, REBECCA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DETER DISTRACT DELAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristine M. Boylan

KRISTINE M. BOYLAN BRIGGS AND MORGAN, P.A.80 SOUTH 8TH STREETSUITE 2200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Safety equipment for the protection of public buildings, namely, a facility safety system comprised of sprinkler systems for temporarily disorienting and debilitating perpetrators, security control panels, and visible notification strobes, sirens, and speakersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 13, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance