Drawing for HYPERPOWER

USPTO serial 86952835

HYPERPOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYPERPOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott McPherson

Scott McPherson Hyperikon, Inc.8515 Miramar PlaceSan Diego, CA 92121UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011solar thermal-based power plants for generating electricity from solar energy comprised of photovoltaic installation apparatus, solar panels, solar concentrating optics, solar diffusing optics, photovoltaic modules, photovoltaic cells and tracking mechanismsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 30, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 25, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 21, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 8, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 8, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 8, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 8, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 31, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Mar 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 29, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance