Drawing for SMARTLANES

USPTO serial 86954744

SMARTLANES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTLANES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deidra D. Ritcherson

DEIDRA D. RITCHERSON TUROCY & WATSON LLP200 Park AvenueSuite 300Beachwood, OH 44122

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Networking device, namely, computer network interface devices, computer network hubs, computer network adapters or network servers; Wireless communications protocol, namely, software for implementing a wireless communications protocol, software for providing a user graphical user interface for communication and transmission and reception of data, software for implementing a wireless security protocol and user interactions; communication software for providing a wireless communication protocol; communication software for enabling a communication device to operate according to a wireless communication protocol; design libraries, namely, downloadable electronic data files for use in the design and development of networked devices; network serversACTIVE—
042Cloud computing featuring software for use with mobile device applications; cloud computing featuring software for use with mobile device applications to enable use of additional bandwidth capability under the coordination of a network service; computer software and hardware design for others; consulting services in the field of design, and selection of computer hardware and software systems for others; design and development of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 8, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance