USPTO serial 86956039
SNACKS WITHOUT BORDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNACKS WITHOUT BORDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ashley L. Nelson
ASHLEY L. NELSON AMIN TALATI & UPADHYE, LLC100 SOUTH WACKER DRIVESUITE 2000CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Coconut meal; Desiccated coconut; Flaked coconut; Prepared coconut; Processed coconut; Vegetable-based chips, namely, onion chips, zucchini chips, bell pepper chips, mushroom chips, beet chips, taro chips, carrot chips, kale chips, chia seed chips, quinoa chips, chickpea chips, seaweed chips, insect-based chips; Bean-based chips; Fruit-based chips, namely, banana chips, mango chips, pineapple chips, durian chips, jackfruit chips; Plant-based jerky, namely, mushroom jerky and coconut jerky; Seafood and fish-based jerky; Dried fruits, namely, dried mango, dried coconut, dried pineapple, and dried mixed fruit; Nut mixes comprised primarily of processed nuts, roasted nuts, and shelled nuts also containing dried fruit; Fruit leather; Yogurt; Non-dairy yogurt; Jerky; Meat-based snack bars; Processed, edible seaweed; Packaged cut fruits; Packaged cut vegetables; Packaged cut fruits with dips; Packaged cut vegetables with dips; Snack food bars, namely, processed nut-based food bars and processed fruit-based bars; insect-based snack foods, namely, food bars and chips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Candy; Chocolate; Chocolate candies; Chocolate bars; Snack food bars, namely, grain-based energy bars, granola-based food bars, grain-based food bars, chocolate-based food bars; Grain-based chips; Corn-based chips; Rice-based snack foods, namely, chips; Salty snacks, namely, crackers, tortilla chips, pretzels, pita chips; Popcorn; Ice cream; Sorbet; Non-dairy ice cream; Dessert pudding; Cookies made from insects; Cookies; Rice cakes; Crackers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DANG FOODS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Dang Foods, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Dang Foods, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SNACKS WITHOUT BORDERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |