USPTO serial 86956054
SPARKLING ROMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TRICIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPARKLING ROMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory Golla
GREGORY GOLLA MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-9944UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic drinks enhanced with amino acids, vitamins, minerals, or nutrients, namely, isotonic, hypotonic, hypertonic sports drinks, water, and sparkling water, all being non-alcoholic drinks enhanced with amino acids, vitamins, minerals, or nutrients; soft drinks; fruit flavored drink; non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; soda drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |