USPTO serial 86956191
GOH-GOH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 25, 2022
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GOH-GOH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Clady
Susan E. Clady Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP200 Public SquareSuite 2300CLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cereal-based snack food; granola-based snack food; instant cereal mix; oatmeal; food preparations containing granola and milk powder; excluding any all natural, squeezable, resealable fruit and vegetable-based snacks, fruit purees, and dairy-based snack foods | ACTIVE | Dec 21, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunny Crunch Foods Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunny Crunch Foods Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunny Crunch Foods Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GOH-GOH
- Prosecution event R.PR explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 21, 2021 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 23, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |