Drawing for RELIABLE CONNECTIONS

USPTO serial 86956960

RELIABLE CONNECTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELIABLE CONNECTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. Scott Petty

W. SCOTT PETTY KING & SPALDING1180 PEACHTREE STREET, NEATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Air valves, ball valves, butterfly valves, check valves, cone valves, and thermostatic control valves all being parts of machines; drilling machines; energy dissipating valves being parts of machines; gate valves being parts of machines; hydraulic control valves being parts of machines; machines for injecting wax into a mold; plug valves being parts of machines; plunger valves being parts of machines; rectangular valves being parts of machines; fluid-operated piston and cylinder motor other than for land vehicles and made of nonmetallic materials; tapping machines for tapping into water and gas mains; hydraulic valve actuators; valves and structural parts therefor, all being parts of machines for industrial uses in the fields of water and wastewater filtration and power generation; valves for pumpsACTIVE—
009Electric valve actuatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 7, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 7, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance