Drawing for NEELY & CHLOE

USPTO serial 86957180

NEELY & CHLOE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEELY & CHLOE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Catania

MICHAEL CATANIA CLAUSE EIGHT IPSPO BOX 131270CARLSBAD, CA 92013UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear; Footwear for women; ShoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 23, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 22, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 19, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 21, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance