USPTO serial 86957452
SKILLSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKILLSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Grant Morton
Jonathan Grant Morton MORTON & ASSOCIATES LLP246 W BROADWAY 4TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, books in the field of music, education and entertainment, music sheets, music scores, magazines in the field of general human interest; printed matter, namely, printed calendars; photographs; stationary | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |