Drawing for PENN AUTO

USPTO serial 86957812

PENN AUTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PENN AUTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph M. Konieczny, Sr.

JOSEPH M KONIECZNY SR RYDER LU MAZZEO & KONIECZNY LLCPO BOX 670531 PLYMOUTH ROADPLYMOUTH MEETING, PA 19462UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal fasteners for the automotive industry, namely, threaded fasteners, nuts, bolts, screws, inserts, rivets, sleeves, studs and pinsACTIVEMar 17, 2016
012Hardware components for the automotive industry, namely, fasteners for brake components and fluid handling components; bushings, compression limiters and dowel pins, all specially adapted for land vehiclesACTIVEMar 17, 2016
042Product engineering services for others, namely, design engineering of hardware components and fasteners for the automotive industryACTIVEMar 17, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 29, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 29, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 16, 2018EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Nov 14, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 16, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2018ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2018MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 14, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 14, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 13, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 13, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2017ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 15, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2017RMRFREMOVE FROM TEASRF—
Jan 25, 2017ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance