USPTO serial 86958337
TORTILLA CRISPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TORTILLA CRISPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal E. Friedman
NEAL E FRIEDMAN DAVIS & BUJOLD PLLC112 PLEASANT STREETCONCORD, NH 03301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Oven baked tortilla chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |