USPTO serial 86958636
ALPHAGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRELL, STEVEN WAYNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALPHAGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Shaddox
ROBERT C. SHADDOX WINSTEAD PCP.O. BOX 131851DALLAS, TX 75313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations in the nature of unprocessed polyurethane and polyurea and combinations thereof, polyaspartic, and epoxy, all for use as protective coatings in the industrial, commercial, military, residential, and agricultural applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Chemical preparations in the nature of polyurethane and polyurea and combinations thereof, polyaspartic, and epoxy, all for use as protective coatings for interior and exterior use on a variety of substrates in industrial, commercial, military, residential and agricultural applications; coatings in the nature of industrial sealants for waterproofing and surface hardening; protective coatings in the nature of polymers, polymer concrete, stains, dyes, epoxy, acrylic finishes, decorative flake finishes, for exterior and interior use on a variety of substrates; coatings in the nature of stains, synthetic dyes, and primers for application to all surfaces; sprayable polyurethane and polyuria, and combinations thereof, protective coatings for application on a wide range of commercial, industrial and consumer products, namely, horse trailers, van floors, truck beds, sidewalks and commercial equipment; protective polyurethane and polyuria, and combinations thereof coatings for railcars, truck tool boxes, ATVs, utility vehicles, vehicle rocker panels, exterior luggage tubs for vehicles, boat decks, boat hulls, bows of boats, recreational vehicle roofs, utility trucks, utility vans, buses, emergency vehicles, construction vehicles, and sleds for recreational vehicles and fishing houses | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Polymer sealant for cleaning, shining and protecting polyurethane coatings in or on truck bed liners | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Applying protective polyurethane and polyurea, and combinations thereof, coatings on a wide range of commercial, industrial and consumer products; applying protective polyurethane and polyurea (and combinations thereof) coatings to railcars, truck tool boxes, ATVs, utility vehicles, vehicle rocker panels, exterior luggage tubs for vehicles, boat decks, boat hulls, bows of boats, recreational vehicle roofs, utility trucks, utility vans, buses, emergency vehicles, construction vehicles, and sleds for recreational vehicles and fishing houses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Renegard, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named ALPHAGARD
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |