Drawing for MASTERCHEF

USPTO serial 86958656

MASTERCHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MASTERCHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberto Ledesma

ROBERTO LEDESMA LAW OFFICE OF ROBERTO LEDESMAPO BOX 230692NEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; chef knives; kitchen knives; cake cutters; pizza cutters; non-electric can openers; cheese slicers and cheese knives; disposable tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; electric razors; non-electric razors; fish scalers; hand-operated kitchen appliance for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food; hand-operated meat choppers, nutcrackers, oyster openers, scissors; Hand tools, namely, spatulas; Hand-operated slicers; fruit, vegetable and potato peeling knives; hand operated tool for making shaved ice; hand-operated cutters for making pasta; nut crackers; palette knives; thread snips; zesters; knife sharpeners; barbecue sets, namely, barbecue forks, barbecue knives, barbecue tongs, barbecue flippers, barbecue grill cleaners, barbecue containers, barbecue chopping planksACTIVE—
021Barbecue basting brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2018GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 26, 2018GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 26, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 23, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 29, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 23, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance