USPTO serial 86960461
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Westmount, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Kremer
MARK D. KREMER CONKLE, KREMER & ENGEL3130 WILSHIRE BLVD.SUITE 500SANTA MONICA, CA 90403| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bouillon; Bouillon concentrates; Broth; Broth concentrates; Dried vegetables; Edible oils; Flavoured nuts; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit chips; Fruit jellies; Jams; Low-fat potato chips; Milk of almonds for culinary purposes; Potato chips; Potato crisps; Prepared nuts; Rice milk for use as a milk substitute; Soups; Tomato purée | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Biscuits; Bread; Bread rolls; Breadcrumbs; Burritos; Cakes; Cereal-based snack food; Cereal bars; Chewing gum; Cookies; Corn flakes; Crackers; Dressings for salad; High-protein cereal bars; Ketchup; Mayonnaise; Muesli; Noodle-based prepared meals; Oatmeal; Pasta; Pasta sauce; Pesto sauce; Pizza; Popcorn; Rice-based snack food; Tomato sauce; Waffles; High-protein cereal bars; Rice cakes; Sauces; Soy sauce | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |