USPTO serial 86962299
M MARRANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- โ
- Examiner
- MAZZELLA, BRANDY BARRETT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M MARRANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Backpacks; Briefcases; School bags; Sports bags; Travel bags; Wallets; Canvas shopping bags; Card wallets; Key wallets; Leather bags and wallets; Leather credit card cases; Name card cases; Pocket wallets | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | โ |
| Jun 2, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | โ |
| Jun 2, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Jun 2, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Feb 22, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Nov 29, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | โ |
| Nov 1, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | โ |
| Nov 1, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | โ |
| Sep 27, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Sep 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Sep 1, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Aug 23, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | โ |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | โ |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Aug 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | โ |
| Jul 18, 2016 | RTTP | RESTORE TO TEAS PLUS | โ |
| Jul 18, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | โ |
| Jul 18, 2016 | RTTP | RESTORE TO TEAS PLUS | โ |
| Jul 18, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | โ |
| Jul 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Apr 7, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | โ |
| Apr 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Apr 6, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |