Drawing for THE WHARF AMPHITHEATER

USPTO serial 86963506

THE WHARF AMPHITHEATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5343837Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2017
Examiner
WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with THE WHARF AMPHITHEATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claude F. Reynaud, Jr.

Claude F. Reynaud, Jr. BREAZEALE, SACHSE & WILSON, LLP301 Main Street, 23rd FloorP.O. Box 3197BATON ROUGE, LA 70821

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Recreational services, namely, providing entertainment services in the nature of arranging of showing movie and concerts and entertainment and recreational facilities in the nature of facilities for movies, concerts, and special events, within a mixed-use commercial and residential resort communityACTIVEOct 1, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Nov 17, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2024C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 29, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2023E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 21, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 27, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 15, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 3, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 28, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 19, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 19, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance