Drawing for BRAND TRUE

USPTO serial 86963858

BRAND TRUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAND TRUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L. Kirkpatrick

RICHARD L. KIRKPATRICK PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. BOX 2824CALENDAR/DOCKETING DEPARTMENTSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-2824

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Women's and children's jewelryACTIVE
018Women's and children's handbags; men's, women's and children's walletsACTIVE
025Men's apparel, namely, shirts, sweaters, pants, shorts, jeans, jackets, coats, socks, underwear, undershirts, pajamas, loungewear, robes, hats, belts, scarves, gloves, swimwear; men's shoes, boots, sandals, slippers; women's apparel, namely, shirts, blouses, sweaters, pants, shorts, jeans, skirts, dresses, jackets, coats, socks, hosiery, undergarments, pajamas, loungewear, hats, belts, scarves, gloves, swimwear; women's shoes, boots, sandals, slippers; children's apparel, namely, layettes, shirts, dresses, blouses, sweaters, pants, shorts, jeans, skirts, jackets, coats, socks, hosiery, undergarments, pajamas, loungewear, hats, belts, scarves, gloves, swimwear; children's shoes, boots, sandals, slippersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 11, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 11, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 11, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 10, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 21, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 21, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 7, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance