Drawing for ECLIPSE

USPTO serial 86964609

ECLIPSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECLIPSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph W. Berenato, III

JOSEPH W BERENATO III BERENATO & WHITE LLC6550 ROCK SPRING DRIVE SUITE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Doors made of metal and prehung doors made of metal incorporating at least one of a door lite, side lite and transom lite in the nature of glass and plastic panels which are sold as an integral component of metal entry doors and door entranceways; door lites, side lites and transom lites in the nature of glass and plastic panels which are sold for use as integral components of metal entry doors and door entrancewaysACTIVE—
019Doors not made of metal and prehung doors not of metal incorporating at least one of a door lite, side lite and transom lite in the nature of glass and plastic panels which are sold as an integral component of entry doors not of metal and door entranceways; door lites, side lites and transom lites in the nature of glass and plastic panels which are sold for use as integral components of entry doors not of metal and door entrancewaysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 14, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 14, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 12, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 12, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 14, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 14, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 14, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance