USPTO serial 86965414
ESTERLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESTERLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Countermeasure systems for air and land defense, in the nature of computers and operating software for controlling smoke generating blocks and dispensers therefor, smoke detonators, rockets, projectiles, missiles, ammunition, balloons, flares, pyrotechnics, explosives, and launchers therefor; emergency flares; remote controls for operating missiles, rockets, projectiles, ammunition, flares, explosives, pyrotechnics, smoke generating blocks and dispensers therefor; structural parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Target flares; tracking flares; infrared flares; countermeasure decoy flares, namely, target flares, tracking flares, spectral flares, infrared flares, and structural parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Defense equipment and defense systems, in the nature of rocket launchers, projectile launchers, guided and ballistic missile launchers, projectiles, guided and ballistic missiles and ammunition, control equipment and operational equipment for all such systems sold as a component thereof or sold together as a unit therewith; rockets; missiles; pyrotechnics; rockets for carrying materials to be deployed in defense, decoy and weapon systems; rockets containing flares, chaff or reflective materials for radio and radar; structural parts for all the aforesaid goods; Mortars; mortar shells; propelling charge containers for mortar ammunition; radar countermeasure chaff in the form of aluminum coated glass fibers and other materials for defeating radar and radar guided weapon systems; missile defense decoy systems comprised of pyrotechnic expendable devices, pyrophoric expendable devices, chaff, and chaff dispensers; expendable infrared decoys in the nature of kinematic flares for purposes of defeating acquisition by infrared homing or heat-seeking missile systems; spectral flares and MTV flares all in the nature of countermeasure devices for purposes of defeating acquisition by infrared homing or heat-seeking missile systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacturing services in the fields of countermeasures for air and land defense, signaling, testing, measuring and acoustic apparatus and instruments; Custom manufacturing in the field of decoy systems; Custom manufacturing in the fields of ordnance products, infrared decoy flares, radar countermeasure chaff, missile countermeasures, torpedo decoy systems and pyrotechnic devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product research, development, engineering, design and testing of new products for others; product research, development, engineering, design and testing in the field of ordnance products, infrared decoy flares, radar countermeasure chaff, missile countermeasures, torpedo decoy systems and pyrotechnic devices; development and analysis of expendable decoy systems; development and analysis of expendable decoy systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Esterline Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Esterline Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ESTERLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |