Drawing for ORAH

USPTO serial 86965420

ORAH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORAH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas H. Zellerbach and Eileen Z. Aghnami

THOMAS H. ZELLERBACH AND EILEEN Z. AGHNAMI ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLPIP PROSECUTION2050 MAIN STREET, SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009accessories for virtual reality cameras and video cameras, namely, LED lights, tripods, microphones, and lensesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Mar 20, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 7, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 9, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance