Drawing for AETHER

USPTO serial 86965652

AETHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AETHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie B. Seyler

JULIE B SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Fragrances and perfumery; Fragrances for personal use; Perfume; Perfume oils; Perfumed powders; Perfumed soap; Perfumed soaps; Perfumes; Body spray used as a fragrance; Eau de perfumeABANDONED—
004Candles; Perfumed candlesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 8, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 8, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 8, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 31, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 9, 2018OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 10, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2018ZZBXALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION—
Feb 19, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2017DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2016GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2016GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2016EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Oct 24, 2016CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance