USPTO serial 86966212
SCRUBOUT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCRUBOUT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul K. Tomita
PAUL K. TOMITA STANIFORD TOMITA LLPPO BOX 591838SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94159-1838UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Operating room apparatus comprised of operative armor, namely, protective body barriers and suture needle traps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |