USPTO serial 86966325
LOUPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOUPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher H. Brown, Jr.,
CHRISTOPHER H. BROWN, JR., BLAIR & ROACH, LLP2645 SHERIDAN DRIVETONAWANDA, NY 14150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software and downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for handheld computers, digital electronic devices, wireless devices and internet capable devices that allow users to locate and map food, dining and drinking establishments, businesses, venues and events, namely, restaurants, bars, cocktail lounges, wine bars, food and grocery stores, pastry shops, farmers markets, food trucks, vineyards, wine tastings, food and foodie events and home dining and take-out services; computer application software and downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for handheld computers, digital electronic devices, wireless devices and internet capable devices that allow users to access and share information on food, dining and drinking establishments, businesses, venues and events, namely, restaurants, bars, cocktail lounges, wine bars, food and grocery stores, pastry shops, farmers markets, food trucks, food trends, vineyards, wine tastings, wine pairings, food and foodie events and home dining and take-out services, namely, prices, compilations, rankings, ratings, reviews, referrals, contact information, recommendations, deals, special offers, discounts and coupons; computer application software and downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for handheld computers, digital electronic devices, wireless devices and internet capable devices in the field of dining and food trends | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2016 |
| 043 | Providing a website featuring information in the field of dining and dining information regarding food trends | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |