USPTO serial 86966453
SECS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NASSERGHODSI, SAHAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SECS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Kuester
JEFFREY R. KUESTER TAYLOR ENGLISH DUMA LLP1600 PARKWOOD CIRCLE, SUITE 400ATLANTA, GA 30339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, electronic transmission of data, messages, graphics, images and information; peer-to-peer photo and video sharing services, namely, electronics transmission of digital photo files among internet users; providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages, images and video among users in the field of general interest; peer-to-peer photo and video sharing services, namely, electronics transmission of digital photo files among internet users in the field of food, restaurants, fashion, make-up, cars, travel, vacations, hotels, resorts, destinations, sports and fitness | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing a web site that gives users the ability to upload photographs and videos; providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to manage their online photograph and social networking accounts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |