CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WESTERN TIMBER FRAME

USPTO serial 86966635

WESTERN TIMBER FRAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WESTERN TIMBER FRAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brett J. Davis

BRETT J DAVIS PIA ANDERSON MOSS HOYT136 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE STE 1900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Outdoor timber frame structures that are sold as kits, including, pergolas, pavilions, trellises, breezeways and gazebos, all of the foregoing sold exclusively through retail locationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 5, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 5, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 24, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 3, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 20, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 14, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 6, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Nov 29, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 8, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 8, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 8, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 10, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance