USPTO serial 86967779
3DBOTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 3DBOTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Hansen
STEVEN R. HANSEN HANSEN IP LAW PLLC2550 S. TELEGRAPH RD.SUITE 112BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Solid imaging materials for use in three dimensional (3D) printers, namely, unprocessed plastics, ceramics powders used in manufacturing, minerals in the nature of silica sand, in powder form; and solvent and water-based liquid binders for binding powder particles, to create 3D embodiments of computer generated designs for direct manufacturing and prototyping in a solid freeform fabrication process | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Data processing equipment, in particular for computer aided design; software, in particular for computer aided design for custom fabrication and production of new products for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Material processing using 3D printing technology for third parties, namely, processing plastic material, metal, glass or sand particles into three dimensional models for others; Custom manufacturing of three dimensional forms and cores for molding of three dimensional parts for industrial and commercial applications using 3D-printing technology for third parties; Custom manufacturing of three dimensional molds and cores for molding of three dimensional parts for industrial and commercial applications using 3D-printing technology or additive manufacturing, for third parties; Custom manufacturing of three dimensional parts by use of plastic material, metal, glass or sand particles for industrial and commercial applications using 3D-printing technology or additive manufacturing, for third parties; Custom manufacturing of three dimensional models for industrial and commercial applications using 3D-printing technology or additive manufacturing, for third parties; custom manufacturing services for third parties, in particular production of molds for commercial and industrial applications; prototype fabrication of new products for others, in particular with sand mold forms; prototype fabrication of new products for others, in particular with 3D-printing produced molds made of plastic material, metal, glass or sand | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of sand mold forms; Research and development in the field of new products for third parties in the field of industrial plastic materials; Technological consultation in the technology field of sand mold forms; Research in the field of production and processing of sand mold forms; Development of computer hardware and computer software, in particular computer aided design software; Consulting services in the field of technical product development and development of engineering processes for third parties for the production of three dimensional parts by way of additive production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 3dbotics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 3dbotics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named 3DBOTICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |