Drawing for 2STORE

USPTO serial 86968340

2STORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 2STORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela N. Hirschman

PAMELA N. HIRSCHMAN SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY, SUITE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Conveyor machines used to move goods and materials in the field of interlogistics; lifting installations for the transport of goods; storage and order-picking systems consisting of conveyor machines in the field of intralogistics; pneumatic transporters; conveyor belts; belt, roller and chain conveyors; elevators; mechanical lifting and hoisting installations for the transport of goods; lifting work platforms; mechanical and hydraulic lifts for moving goods; road roller bridges; lifting machines for the transport of goods; ball transfer units for use in conveyor system for the storage and retrieval of goods; machine operated platforms used for the transfer, storage and retrieval of goods in high bay warehouses; pneumatic machines for the transportation of goods; machines for the packaging of goods; industrial robots; pneumatic controls for machines, engines and motors; sorting and dispatch systems comprising conveyors and variable speed drives for machines; automatic material handling machines, namely, automatic pallet dispensing machines and automatic slip sheet dispensing machinesACTIVE—
009(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on 44(e)) Computer hardware and computer software for controlling conveying machines in the field of intralogisticsACTIVE—
012(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Land vehicles in the field of intralogistics; aerial conveyors in the field of intralogistics; storage and retrieval vehicles, namely, trolleys, sleds for transport purposes, forklift trucks; all the aforesaid goods featuring a lifting function for independently operating within a rack storage unit for storing and retrieving stored goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 12, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 14, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 6, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2017ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 11, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance