Drawing for OPTQUENCY

USPTO serial 86968973

OPTQUENCY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTQUENCY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott D. Kumpf

SCOTT D. KUMPF KUMPF, CHARSLEY & HANSEN LLC9565 S KINGSTON CT STE 100ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112-6010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Receivers, transmitters and wireless network repeaters for receiving, broadcasting and repeating harmonic signals used in the development of agricultural productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 6, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 6, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 11, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 18, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 19, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 3, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 5, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 5, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 8, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance