Drawing for SKYLINER

USPTO serial 86969581

SKYLINER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKYLINER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alyssa Worsham

ALYSSA WORSHAM WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL ROADPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software development tools; computer software platforms and software components, namely, computer programs and computer software development tools for automating distribution, updating, scaling, monitoring, and maintenance of software services; computer software for use in managing, analyzing, optimizing, provisioning, monitoring, and scaling of computer resources; computer software for use in generating and providing reports containing information about computer security, performance, costs, storage and usage; providing an downloadable databases in the fields of website design, data storage, shared computing capacity scalingACTIVE—
035application service provider, namely, databases management in the fields of website design, data storage, shared computing capacity scalingACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others, website hosting services, computer programming, and rental of database servers; application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing and maintaining applications, software, websites in the fields of ecommerce, online payments, order queuing, website design, data storage, shared computing capacity scaling, messaging services and calculation of website ranking based on user traffic; Development, updating and maintenance of database systems in the fields of website design, data storage, shared computing capacity scaling; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in managing, analyzing, optimizing, provisioning, monitoring, and scaling of computer resources; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in generating and providing reports containing information about computer security, performance, costs, storage and usage; consulting services and technical consulting services in the fields of software development, software for computing, cloud computing, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; computer monitoring service which tracks application software performance, performs periodic maintenance and provides reports and alerts concerning such performance; providing virtual computer systems and virtual computing environments through private and public cloud computing; technical support services, namely, providing customer support and troubleshooting in the nature of computer software developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2016CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2016GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2016GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2016CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance