Drawing for LEEP

USPTO serial 86970690

LEEP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEEP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esq.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esq. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP60 State StreetBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing web-based temporary use of non-downloadable analytical mapping software for use in planning and permitting surficial energy infrastructure; providing web-based temporary use of non-downloadable analytical mapping software for generating and risk-ranking placement scenarios on environmental impacts and development costs for reduced environmental impacts; Environment consulting services using analytical mapping software in planning and permitting surficial energy infrastructure; environment consulting services using analytical mapping software in generating and risk-ranking placement scenarios on environmental impacts and development costs for reduced environmental impactsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 29, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 29, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 29, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 1, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 1, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 22, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 18, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 16, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 16, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 16, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 13, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 22, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance