Drawing for MEUCCI

USPTO serial 86971506

MEUCCI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MEUCCI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine B. Redfield,

CHRISTINE B. REDFIELD, FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STREETSILICON VALLEY CENTERMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Smartphone and tablet software applications for instant messaging, individual and group discussions, and transferring audio, video, images and textACTIVEFeb 8, 2016
038Instant messaging servicesACTIVEFeb 8, 2016
042Providing an on-line network environment that features technology that enables users to monitor content in chat roomsACTIVEFeb 8, 2016
045Monitoring of chat rooms for security purposesACTIVEFeb 8, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 31, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 4, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 16, 2017FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Feb 10, 2017ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance