USPTO serial 86972841
LAURENEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGALL, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAURENEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Philadelphia, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred H. Zollinger III
FRED H. ZOLLINGER III ZOLLINGER & BURLESON LTD.P.O. BOX 2368NORTH CANTON, OH 44720UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Point of purchase displays; apparatus for the presentation of retail goods, namely, display racks; display stands for merchandise; display stands for shop windows; free-standing display stands for use in retail premises; display signs for retail goods; menus for display of goods for sale to customers; lighted display signs; lighted menus for display of goods for sale to customer | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom design of point-of-purchase (POP) displays and merchandising systems; consultation services, design services, and manufacturing services related to merchandise displays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |