USPTO serial 86973665
NETLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Grant Morton
Jonathan Grant Morton Morton & Associates, LLP246 WEST BROADWAYNew York, NY 10013Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for processing digital music files, for processing digital images, for creating digital animation and special effects of images, for manipulating digital audio information for use in audio media applications, and to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely, for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures; Computer software for wireless content delivery, for controlling and managing access server applications, for monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems, for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information, and software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |