USPTO serial 86974590
K9VETRAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with K9VETRAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna M. Quinn
ANNA M. QUINN LATHROP & GAGE LLPBLDG 82 STE 100010851 MASTIN BLVDOVERLAND PARK, KS 66210-1669Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Wearable sensors for monitoring the physical movements and activities of animals wearing the sensors for veterinary purposes and related software for processing and reporting output from such sensors sold therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Veterinary specialty services providing advanced medical, diagnostic or surgical services for animals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AgLogica Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AgLogica Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named K9VETRAX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |