Drawing for PARADIGM SWITCH

USPTO serial 86974640

PARADIGM SWITCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARADIGM SWITCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth K. Rucki

ELIZABETH K. RUCKI BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.STE 6002001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data center switches; Ethernet switches; Electric switches; Telecommunication switches; Computer network switches; Computer network server; Computer hardware and software for setting up and configuring local area and wide area networks; Computer hardware and software for switching and processing Ethernet and IP traffic for use in and with networks and data centers; Computer network adapters, switches, routers, and hubsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 14, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 13, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 9, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance