Drawing for STYLEDEMOCRACY

USPTO serial 86974698

STYLEDEMOCRACY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GANDARA, KEYLA MARIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STYLEDEMOCRACY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria Johnson

MARIA JOHNSON De Novo Legal, PC2055 CORTE DEL NOGALCARLSBAD, CA 92011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services in the field of luxury clothing, fashion clothing, beauty products, cosmetics, home living items; Provision of e-commerce and digital marketing strategy services; Marketing and advertising services for third parties; Digital marketing services for third parties; Sales promotion for goods of others by hosting online warehouse sales events, physical sample sales events and pop-up shops services for third parties; Host shopping events for third parties for commercial, promotional or advertising purposes; Sales promotion for goods of others by hosting warehouse sales events, retail sales events, and sample sales events; Provision of an educational and informational website focusing on retail, apparel, footwear and home living for consumersACTIVE—
041Provision of an online lifestyle blog in the field of retail, clothing, cosmetics, footwear, cooking, home decorating and general shopping; Host online contests, namely, arranging and conducting contests, for third partiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance