USPTO serial 86975117
KISKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 22, 2025
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with KISKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Concannon
Patrick J. Concannon Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP155 Seaport BoulevardSeaport WestBoston, MA 02210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | apparel, namely, casual t-shirts, casual shirts, casual sweatshirts, casual pants, casual shorts, athletic shirts, athletic sweatshirts, athletic pants, and athletic shorts; headwear, namely, caps, hats, and toques; footwear, namely, casual footwear and athletic footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | toys, namely, sand box toys, construction toys, bath toys, beach toys, namely, beach balls, inflatable balls, toy pails, toy shovels, and water-squirting toy; games, namely, card games, board games, action skill games, action target games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 329985 Ontario Limited
- Other trademarks owned by 329985 Ontario Limited
- Other trademarks owned by 329985 Ontario Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named KISKO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2025 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |