USPTO serial 86975283
BQ BAG PORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BQ BAG PORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
35708 Haiger, DE
35708 Haiger, DE
ST. PAUL, MN
ST. PAUL, MN
BALDWIN, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo G. Lenna
LEO G. LENNA SORELL, LENNA & SCHMIDT, LLP99 SMITHTOWN BYP FL 2HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-2521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Safe deposit box services, namely, deposit of valuables; safety deposit box services; financial consultation relating to franchising | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of baggage trolleys; maintenance and repair of safely deposit boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product development consultation; product development consultation relating to baggage carts, baggage cart depot services, services teams in the nature of baggage carts, baggage cart management, baggage storage, self service lockers, lost property services and porter services; product development consultation, namely, planning and improving the operation of baggage carts; product development relating to baggage carts, baggage cart depot services, services teams in the nature of baggage carts, baggage cart management, baggage storage, self service lockers, lost property services and porter services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal services regarding business franchising | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by bagport GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by bagport GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by SMARTE CARTE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SMARTE CARTE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAGPORFT HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BQ BAG PORT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 4, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |