Drawing for TCC

USPTO serial 86975509

TCC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TCC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin P. Welch

Justin P. Welch Baker & McKenzie LLP2001 Ross Avenue2300 Trammell Crow CenterDallas, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Charitable fundraising services, by means of providing individuals with the information and opportunity to make monetary donations to their favorite charityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 5, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 28, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2015DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Mar 20, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 14, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 4, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance