USPTO serial 86975735
SUBVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUBVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Tietsworth
STEVEN C. TIETSWORTH SEESCAN, INC.3855 RUFFIN RDSAN DIEGO, CA 92123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cameras; push-cables for mechanically deploying a camera head into a pipe or cavity; push-cable reels for storing mechanical push-cables; camera control units (CCUs); video display devices for displaying images or video from cameras attached to mechanical push-cables; Audio output devices for rendering audio output from microphones or acoustic sensors; antennas; radio transmitters; radio receivers; audio sensors and apparatus for receiving, storing and/or rendering audio signals from utility locators or inspection cameras; electromagnetic apparatus used to generate magnetic fields; magnetic field antennas; apparatus for generating electric current to be coupled to hidden or buried utilities so as to emit magnetic fields from the hidden or buried utilities, namely, current signal transmitters; apparatus for conveying and distributing electric current to be coupled to hidden or buried utilities so as to emit magnetic fields from the hidden or buried utilities; electrical couplers for directly, inductively, or capacitively coupling electrical current signals to hidden or buried utilities; electronic devices for integrating audio or video signals with radio signals; electronic devices for generating audio or video signals from within pipes or conduits; radio frequency identification (RFID) tags; radio frequency identification (RFID) tag readers; devices for detecting and processing signals from RFID devices; leak detection electromagnetic sensor equipment for electromagnetically locating leaks in pipes or conduits; magnetic field sondes for insertion into pipes or other cavities; electronic sondes for insertion into pipes and conduits for emitting electromagnetic signals to aid in their location, comprising small battery-powered radio frequency transmitters that are enclosed in housings; single use batteries; rechargeable batteries; battery cases; battery chargers; battery packs; battery monitoring devices for attachment to a battery to monitor the performance of the battery and operating software for use therewith; battery status monitors; battery performance monitors; battery testers; intelligent battery chargers; intelligent battery monitors and testers; battery backup systems; remote battery monitoring systems comprising a battery, an electronic measurement apparatus for use in the measurement of battery health and performance, and a remote computer software program that uses the foregoing data to trend, predict, and store data related to the health of the battery; computer hardware and peripheral devices; manually operated user input devices for electronic test equipment; manually operated user input devices for electronic measurement equipment; software for integrating audio or video signals with radio signals; software for receiving signals from user input devices and generating output command or control signals; software for receiving input device signals and controlling the output of a display device; software for receiving input device signals and controlling operation of an electronic test or measurement system; virtual reality computer hardware and software; simulation software; software for sending or receiving information between electronic devices and intelligent batteries; intelligent battery operating software; software for testing or monitoring battery operation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |