USPTO serial 86975885
BRAND PIMPS & MEDIA WHORES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WANG, WEN HSING
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAND PIMPS & MEDIA WHORES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Brand concept and brand development services for corporate and individual clients; Brand imagery consulting services; Brand positioning services; Branding services, namely, consulting, development, management and marketing of brands for businesses and/or individuals; Event planning and management for marketing, branding, promoting or advertising the goods and services of others; Fashion show exhibitions for commercial purposes; Marketing and branding services, namely, providing customized communication programs to obtain consumer insights and develop branding strategies; Marketing and consulting services in the field of promoting and tracking the goods, services, and brands of others through all public communication means; Organization of fashion shows for commercial purposes; Promoting, advertising and marketing of the brands, products, services and online websites of individuals, businesses and nonprofit organizations; Promoting, marketing and advertising the brands and goods of others related to all industries, through all public and private communication means, namely, promoting the brands and goods of others made in the United States; Public relations; Retail clothing boutiques; Social media strategy and marketing consultancy focusing on helping clients create and extend their product and brand strategies by building virally engaging marketing solutions | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |