USPTO serial 86975949
ULTIMATE MATCH UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4709865Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 2015
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTIMATE MATCH UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Cady
James R. Cady Hogan Lovells US LLP4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100Menlo Park, CA 94025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live visual performances and live appearances by a professional entertainer; entertainment services, namely, providing ongoing television programs and radio programs in the field of sports and arm wrestling; providing recognition and incentives by the way of awards to demonstrate excellence in the field of sports and arm wrestling; entertainment services in the nature of ongoing reality based TV shows; conducting seminars and trainings in the field of sports and arm wrestling; providing information via the internet pertaining to athletic and entertainment events, arm wrestling and reality TV programs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 12, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |